Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Looking back at 2012 and forward to 2013

Christmas is a magical time of the year, especially for kids who are filled with excitement about this special season of giving when they are the recipients of gifts expressing the love of their parents and family.  This is truly the season of love, a time to reflect on the immense love of our God who miraculously came into the world for our benefit and at His great expense.  I’ve often wondered how God could leave the unimaginable happiness of heaven to suffer and die here on earth.  The only rational explanation is that He loves us so much, He would give up everything for our benefit.  What’s even more disconcerting is that He did so, despite our foolishness and sinfulness.   In human terms, it’s unimaginable.  In some small way, we imitate this love when we make sacrifices out of love for our children.  Despite their selfish nature and lack of understanding, we go to great lengths to give them many gifts and special memories while commemorating the birth of Our Lord so many long years ago.
We are all God’s children and Christmas reminds us that we are loved and cherished by God Our Father, even though we often forget the sacrifices He has made on our behalf.  Looking back at 2012, much has happened that reflects our collective selfishness and forgetfulness.  As a nation we seem to be turning our backs on the Truth as revealed by God.  He has revealed many truths in the very nature of life and of our bodies, but somehow we no longer believe these truths.    With five states that now approve of gay marriage, several are also promoting gay marriage openly in public schools.  In Massachusetts the state approved curriculum states that gay marriage is “natural and wholesome.”  Parents who objected to this, lost their appeal in court to have their children excused from this indoctrination.  Although the very nature of our bodies demonstrates the untruth of this teaching, it is the official law of the land and all children will be taught what is lawful, even when the law is a lie.
2012 culminated in a contentious election that represented the choice between two competing and opposite ideologies.  One party advocated a culture of death which promoted abortion even to the point of forcing employers and taxpayers to fund them.   As the party in control of government, they also refused to enforce the duly passed laws protecting marriage, and adopted support for gay marriage as part of their party platform.  The other party officially opposed abortion while supporting marriage and advocating economic reforms, but lost the election.  Our nation has chosen to continue the course it is on, which will bring with it the continual decline of birth rates, putting us on the same path already tread by Japan and much of Europe.
In every country that has adopted these policies which depress birth rates, economies fail.  Japan is in dire straits now as a result of decades of declining birthrates which have devastated their economy.   This isn’t just my opinion.  Here’s a quote from a stock analyst, published in an investing newsletter:
“Japan is literally dying. It's got the worst demographics ever recorded. The number of senior citizens, or "silvers" as they are called because of their silver- colored hair, is growing faster than both the number of new workers needed to support them and the number of children needed to replace them.  Between the low birth rate and aging population, Japan will lose more than 33% of its population by century's end.   Japan has experienced a tremendous shift in education, how young people are employed, and a dramatic polarization of younger versus older members of their society. Haves and have-nots are not the issue.  What seems to be at stake is the sentiment that the older generation has had it all, while leaving tremendous burdens to the younger generation that they didn't sign up for.  With declining birth rates, Japan is now expected to drop from 2.8 workers supporting each retiree in 2008 to 1.5 by 2050. 
Of course, with the fiscal cliff approaching, the tax debate is now front and center. But lower birth rates also mean much of the debate is misdirected.   It's not so much a matter of taxing the rich as it is how we deal with declining revenues. No matter how you cut the moral debate about taxing the rich or having more people pay in, fewer workers will mean future tax receipts go down.   And that, in turn, means there will be even less to spend when the rapidly graying population needs it the most.” (The Oxford Club, Dec 2012)
Japan has run up outrageous debt they cannot repay and they are the most indebted nation in the world.  Their combined government, corporate, and private debt now exceeds 500% of GDP. Their stock index, the Nikkei, is down 74% from what it was in 1989, and their economy shrank another 3.5% just in the last quarter.  While their elderly population continues to expand, the number of workers is shrinking and no amount of government taxation and spending can fix these problems.  Japan just elected its sixth prime minister in 6 years and he ran on a platform of more government spending to stimulate their shrinking economy, but this will only exacerbate their already intractable problems. 
This is where the USA is headed because we continue to spend 40% more money than our government takes in, and at the same time, we seem to have embraced policies that discourage tradition marriage and families… the only source of new life.   The Oxford Club letter summed it up this way in the headline for their article: “If you don’t have new children, you cannot replace your population.”  This has serious long term consequences for our economy because fewer consumers means fewer jobs and lower tax revenue collected by the government.  For more than 100 years we’ve been hearing about the dangers of excessive population growth, and apparently millions of people have bought into this misguided advice.  The real reason worldwide population has grown has nothing to do with birthrates, and everything to do with increased longevity. 
Here’s the problem in a nutshell:  At the end of World War II there were 42 workers for every person collecting Social Security, and Medicare did not even exist.  In 1960, the worker to beneficiary ratio of the social security program was 5.1 workers to one person receiving benefits.  In 2009, that figure fell to 3.0 workers per beneficiary.  According to the Social Security Administration's Trustees report, that number will fall to 2.2 workers per beneficiary by 2030. But with birth rates falling, that number could be even lower than expected.   There are implications in terms of health care rationing, too.  It will affect home care, assisted living, traffic, mobility, technology, and taxes. Especially taxes...  

We cannot tax and spend our way to prosperity.   There simply are not, and will never be, enough tax payers to fund all our existing entitlement programs, especially with our declining birth rates and 47% of American workers paying no federal income tax at all.  The tax increases called for by the party in the White House offers only a modest reduction in the rate of growth in our national debt.  The chart below shows federal tax revenue in green and the effect of the tax increase in blue.  The red area represents the amount of spending that exceeds our federal revenue.  Most of the spending associated with Obamacare begins in 2014 when the Medicaid expansion and subsidies for State Exchanges begin.  With 10,000 baby boomers reaching Medicare and Social Security eligibility age every single day, our national debt will bury us, even with huge tax increases, assuming that these taxes will actually be collected.

 
The chart, prepared with data from the Office of Management and Budget, and the Congressional Budget Office, demonstrates that tax revenues remain flat because the working population will be about the same, while the number of people receiving social security and Medicare benefits will increase significantly over the next 30 years, and because health care costs are increasing faster than inflation.   In other words, we’ll be in the same predicament as Japan in 30 years or so, unless we act now to curb spending. 
2013 will be an interesting year.  Not only will congress have to deal with the “fiscal cliff,” but we’ll face another battle over increasing the federal debt limit again in Spring.   Sadly, our problems are far more complex than simply trying to balance a budget.  Our nation faces a crisis that is rooted in morality.  In our enthusiasm to cast off traditional morality in the name of personal freedom, we are suppressing religious freedom and simultaneously committing national infanticide, at the very time when we need growth in the population of our productive members of society.  Rather than admit to this dilemma, we continue on the path that has been disastrous to Japan, and has already begun to destroy European economies as well.  Although no one on the left will admit it, we desperately need to return to a culture of life, a culture that promotes marriage, childbirth, and families.  We also need to accept responsibility for our spending, and learn to live within our means, rather than heaping mountains of debt on our children and grandchildren.  This is the path to recovery, the path to growth and prosperity.  It involves personal responsibility and a return to the commitments and virtues required to be good parents and citizens who take responsibility for themselves and their family.

No comments:

Post a Comment