Sunday, November 25, 2012

Christ the King and Unveiling the Truth


Today is the feast of Christ the King and the last Sunday of the liturgical year.  Today’s gospel has Jesus standing before Pilot, revealing that He is a king, but not of this world.  Importantly, He also reveals the reason why He came into the world, “For this I was born and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth.  Everyone who belongs to the truth listens to my voice."   If there is one thing we and our world need badly, it’s Truth.   It’s nearly impossible to know what is true, and what is hype these days, depending on your source of information and the agenda of the author.   Jesus came into the world to testify to the Truth of God’s love.  Several times in the gospels Jesus points out that there are times when people do not see with their eyes or hear with their ears.  Apparently He was referring to the fact that at times, we just don’t want to hear the truth, even the truth of God’s love as revealed by Jesus Himself.
Daily scripture readings these last few weeks before Advent, have been from The Book of Revelation, also called “Apocalypse.”  The word “apocalypse” means “unveiling,” and is derived from the same word used during Jewish wedding ceremonies when the groom unveils his bride.  This cryptic last book of the bible is often misunderstood and taken out of context, but it contains numerous references to the truth of God’s plan for our salvation.  Although steeped in exaggerated images and metaphors, it reveals the role of Jesus as the Lamb of God, and attests to the importance and Truth of God’s word as revealed in scripture.  For example, it describes Jesus as the Alpha and the Omega, our beginning (our creator) and our end (our destiny in eternity). 
All of us could benefit from facing the truth, especially when it comes to acknowledging the mistakes we have made and the problems we face in our lives and relationships.  The same goes for our legislators who are all too likely to ignore, deny, or distort the truth of the problems we face as a nation.  Perhaps the new congress will be willing to openly and honestly address (“unveil”) the serious issues we face as a nation.  For starters, it would be nice if everyone could agree that we need to curb the spending binge we’ve been on.  Last year our federal government took in $2.45 trillion in revenue but spent $3.54 trillion – adding $1.1 trillion to our national debt.  In fact, we’ve added $1 trillion in debt each of the last four years, the equivalent of $17,000 for every man, woman and child in the country.  The interest alone on our $16+ trillion debt amounts to $258 billion a year, more than the annual budget of the departments of  Energy, Education, State, Interior, Justice, Commerce, and Homeland Security, combined.  And this is with interest rates at historic lows.  Of course, the biggest expenses we face are Medicare and Social Security which carry unfunded liabilities in excess of $128 trillion.
The sad fact is that these problems are fixable if the two political parties could agree on common sense solutions which have already been posed but ignored due to partisan rivalry.   The thorniest of our fiscal problems is Medicare and there is a viable solution that was vilified during the election cycle, accusing Romney and Ryan of destroying Medicare, when in fact, their proposed solution was a bipartisan proposal co-authored by Paul Ryan and the liberal democrat from Oregon, Ron Wyden.  The name of the bill is actually the “Wyden-Ryan Plan” which has been endorsed by the liberal Brookings Institution and the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Debt Reduction Task Force, headed up by the former chief of the Office of Management and Budget during the Clinton administration. 
For those of you not familiar with the Wyden-Ryan plan, it proposes to let seniors choose between staying in their existing Medicare plans, or, if they can get a better plan, purchase one in the free market with the assistance of federally funded vouchers.  This would be very similar to the current Medicare Advantage program in which seniors choose among insurers who compete on the basis of cost, quality and access to providers and drug lists.  The Medicare Advantage insurers are paid by Medicare to assume the insurance risk of their Medicare-eligible customers.   Now that Rose and I are eligible for Medicare, I shopped around and found that there are dozens of Medicare Advantage plans available to us, many at no additional cost, other than the federal Medicare premium we pay for Parts B and D.  The coverage is so comprehensive, that unlike the standard Medicare plans that require seniors to purchase supplementary coverage at their own expense, no additional coverage is needed, so we save quite a bit of money.   This is the plan that the Obama campaign referred to as “destroying Medicare.”   This plan would move Medicare in the direction of fiscal viability by transferring some of the risk to private insurers who would have strong incentives to operate efficiently while offering competitively priced, attractive plans with excellent service.   It is a responsible, viable plan that has already been accepted by those who understand health care on both sides of the aisle, but during the election cycle it was demonized ad nauseam.  
Similarly, Social Security will run out of money in less than 20 years unless minor changes are made in eligibility age for younger Americans.  I still like the idea of making at least a portion of Social Security a defined contribution program, rather than a defined benefit.   When Bush 43 proposed this, he was ridiculed, but I’d feel a lot more secure about my social security benefit if at least a portion of it was actually in an account with my name on it, rather than sitting in a trust fund that is easily raided when the government needs money.
So as the liturgical year and the 112th  Congress both wind down, lets’ look forward to the Light of Truth coming into the world, and a bit more willingness to be truthful among our politicians so that we can move toward the “unveiling” of solutions for a change.

No comments:

Post a Comment